Nick Carroll wrote:what the FCUK
this was about gauze lines along the rail?
we all live and learn
no, that was the conclusion.
F for comprehension, now go back to any of the myriad of threads devoted to you
Moderators: jimmy, collnarra, PeepeelaPew, Butts, Shari, Forum Moderators
Nick Carroll wrote:what the FCUK
this was about gauze lines along the rail?
we all live and learn
Davros wrote:Ego saved - surfing experience rubbish.
Still a bit small for me, but thanks mate.Natho wrote:MC is not into using volume measure for his boards but it would prob be around 26 Litres or so. There is a fair bit of width nose to tail.
I'm 73kg and could go less foam. These boards cover so much ground you can ride them a bit smaller.
Davros wrote:Ego saved - surfing experience rubbish.
Interesting. Why do you think it avoids those problems? Does he release the concave with the vee out the back? Or is it just all blended really well?Natho wrote:Yeh the trick seems to be the type of rail he uses to compliment the extreme lift and the rail rocker used. The Mermaid model I have just has the most beautiful back end rocker as an example and the rail he uses helps control the lift. Possibly the best small wave board I have ever ridden. The Metro has a deeper concave again and a slightly fishier plan shape and rocker line, but certainly both out of a similar mould.
Never been a fan of really deep singles before now as the ones I have tried tended to track, suck to the face or be delayed in turn response when breaking from a straight line. The MCs have none of those hang ups.
Davros wrote:Ego saved - surfing experience rubbish.
Trev wrote:I have always had a lot of time for Dick
smnmntll wrote:Got one in the mouth once, that was pretty memorable
might have to eat my words on this now. as i've just picked THIS up off gumtree, for erm, FIFTY DOLLARS!Hatchnam wrote:As close as I have got (or want to get) to a high performance board ...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests