Rightnuffink ngo wrote:I too have & use degree of Philosophy & English.Roy_Stewart wrote:
Regarding education I have a degree in Philosphy and English, and also served my time as an apprentice.
![Cool 8)](./images/smilies/icon_cool.gif)
Moderators: jimmy, collnarra, PeepeelaPew, Butts, beach_defender, Shari, Forum Moderators
Rightnuffink ngo wrote:I too have & use degree of Philosophy & English.Roy_Stewart wrote:
Regarding education I have a degree in Philosphy and English, and also served my time as an apprentice.
The technique is to roll under, it works as well as duck diving although it sometimes takes a bit more energy.woolly wrote:
Logged in, banged on "General surf discussion", and couldn't help but notice the "Roy... waffle..." thread, and the "Duck diving technique" threads side by side. This got me to wondering.....
Roy, when you are surfing one of your 14ft plus boards in triple overhead conditions, could you please provide details of your duck diving technique when caught inside.
Please keep it up until they capitulate, I'll get the wheelbarrow.nuffink ngo wrote:I'm practicing my pigeon noises now.Roy_Stewart wrote:
Right, let's stage a coup !
Do you have first hand experience at this and if so could you describe in detail what happened? Pics would be great if available.Roy_Stewart wrote:
Rolling under must be done from the middle area of the board or behind the middle,not the nose, doing it from the nose is a dangerous method and can lead to cartwheeling.
.
Yes I do have first hand experience, though managed to hang on to the board.bumfluff wrote:Do you have first hand experience at this and if so could you describe in detail what happened? Pics would be great if available.Roy_Stewart wrote:
Rolling under must be done from the middle area of the board or behind the middle,not the nose, doing it from the nose is a dangerous method and can lead to cartwheeling.
.
Purely for educational purposes - obviuosly
offshore1 wrote:sure you couldn't just duckdive it roy?
It's possible to hate the filthy world and still love it with an abstract pitying lovesome cnut wrote:There are only two real problems that we face in life, knowing what we want but being unable to know how to get it and/or not knowing what we want
This would seem pretty obvious to me. But I have the most trouble rolling on broken waves. Any specific technique to that Roy?Roy_Stewart wrote:
In bigger waves when rolling while going up the unroken face it's best to grab the board behind the centre and thrust it forwards as one rolls so that it punches through the lip, the nose drops down the back of the wave and pulls one through the wave.
Woolly, you are a first class shit stirrer.woolly wrote:Logged in, banged on "General surf discussion", and couldn't help but notice the "Roy... waffle..." thread, and the "Duck diving technique" threads side by side. This got me to wondering.....
Roy, when you are surfing one of your 14ft plus boards in triple overhead conditions, could you please provide details of your duck diving technique when caught inside.
Thank you.
1) Don't grab on to the board with the legs as the horizontal bodily position will allow the board and rider to be pushed backwards, this can be followed by the tail digging in and the board flipping up vertically, and possibly cartwheeling.bumfluff wrote:This would seem pretty obvious to me. But I have the most trouble rolling on broken waves. Any specific technique to that Roy?Roy_Stewart wrote:
In bigger waves when rolling while going up the unroken face it's best to grab the board behind the centre and thrust it forwards as one rolls so that it punches through the lip, the nose drops down the back of the wave and pulls one through the wave.
BA (on Realsurf) wrote: It's the wild west with a bit more homo-eroticism.
Absolutely sureoffshore1 wrote:
sure you couldn't just duckdive it roy?
Pics or it didn't happen!guard wrote:I have to give him props if he does take "THAT THING out in solid waves. without a legrope too.
Incorrect:Coops@DY wrote:The case against The Thing
- Can't duckdive
- Can't get barreled
- Can't ride large waves
- Kill radius of 200m
- Too expensive
- Decimating the Fiordland National Park
Any more?
You are philosophically, logically and factually incorrect.clay wrote:
Pics or it didn't happen!
It's been a while but there have been many years where I'd go out in everything, regardless of size, shape, or wind direction, always without a leash, in bigger waves usually on a 12 footer, sometimes a 9 or 10 footer, sometimes a 13'9".guard wrote:I have to give him props if he does take "THAT THING out in solid waves. without a legrope too.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 113 guests