Neal Purchase Jnr Quartet
Moderators: collnarra, PeepeelaPew, Butts, Shari, the kalakau kid, Forum Moderators
Re: Neal Purchase Jnr Quartet
ok.
Squail: 5'3, 20 1/4, 2 3/8 flat deck - rounded square
quartet: 5'7, 19 3/4, 2 5/16 rolled deck - round/pinnish.
Obviously the squail is a step-down quartet. It grovels pretty well from waist high up to overhead. It is a very slippery ride. The wider tail gives plenty of lift and those big fins don't feel big - it is quite front footed when driving through dead sections. It's fast and responsive. Doesn't take much before it races the line. It does quite well in taking the late drop and likes to snap at the lip. Sometimes it turns too quick to dig in for a long cutback.
I'm not a fan on the backhand. But that's probably my style. I think it likes to be ridden with a narrow stance from the tail and the looseness takes some time to get used to. It is a very fun board to ride and works best in little rip bowl type waves. What would i change? I'd go stringer-less next time - so that it was lighter.
Quartet can grovel - but it suits much better as daily driver and good wave board. This one is different from my last quartet, which i think had a flatter rocker, was stringer-less and had a rounded square tail. These boards have great drive and work in all sorts of waves - flat faced, barreling, slop etc. Better ridden with a narrow stance and this one i think is much more back footed. Because the tail is rounded/pin it needs to be jammed down into the face of the wave or lip with more pressure than the squail. Because the board is super quick, you don't need to pump for speed, it seems to find the high-line nicely and is unreal for barrels. Seems to naturally find an exit. It suits a more relaxed style of surfing and works frontside and back. Changes? I'd go rounded square - to loosen up the tail - i really like that in the last quartet. If i lived in indo - then the quartet i have would be fine.
Both different boards to surf - but the similarities are in the drive and speed. There is cross-over in them - but when the surf gets good, the quartet is the much better option.
Both excellent boards
Squail: 5'3, 20 1/4, 2 3/8 flat deck - rounded square
quartet: 5'7, 19 3/4, 2 5/16 rolled deck - round/pinnish.
Obviously the squail is a step-down quartet. It grovels pretty well from waist high up to overhead. It is a very slippery ride. The wider tail gives plenty of lift and those big fins don't feel big - it is quite front footed when driving through dead sections. It's fast and responsive. Doesn't take much before it races the line. It does quite well in taking the late drop and likes to snap at the lip. Sometimes it turns too quick to dig in for a long cutback.
I'm not a fan on the backhand. But that's probably my style. I think it likes to be ridden with a narrow stance from the tail and the looseness takes some time to get used to. It is a very fun board to ride and works best in little rip bowl type waves. What would i change? I'd go stringer-less next time - so that it was lighter.
Quartet can grovel - but it suits much better as daily driver and good wave board. This one is different from my last quartet, which i think had a flatter rocker, was stringer-less and had a rounded square tail. These boards have great drive and work in all sorts of waves - flat faced, barreling, slop etc. Better ridden with a narrow stance and this one i think is much more back footed. Because the tail is rounded/pin it needs to be jammed down into the face of the wave or lip with more pressure than the squail. Because the board is super quick, you don't need to pump for speed, it seems to find the high-line nicely and is unreal for barrels. Seems to naturally find an exit. It suits a more relaxed style of surfing and works frontside and back. Changes? I'd go rounded square - to loosen up the tail - i really like that in the last quartet. If i lived in indo - then the quartet i have would be fine.
Both different boards to surf - but the similarities are in the drive and speed. There is cross-over in them - but when the surf gets good, the quartet is the much better option.
Both excellent boards
Hatchnam wrote:
Filthy little hipster.
Re: Neal Purchase Jnr Quartet
That really nails my experience with the Quartet Batoes, especially the narrow stance.. takes a little to get used to but when you do its good.
Same about the barrells, just set your line and it will drive its way out of there... unreal.
Same about the barrells, just set your line and it will drive its way out of there... unreal.
Trev wrote:I have always had a lot of time for Dick
smnmntll wrote:Got one in the mouth once, that was pretty memorable
Re: Neal Purchase Jnr Quartet
Have/had a couple of NPJr boards, I had a rolled deck Quartet rounded square and loved it in all conditions, I reckon it's his best all round board, but I reckon the rolled deck and refined lower rail didn't work as well as a flatter deck with bit more meat upfront. Have new Cuttlefish with a rolled deck with low rail a thinner foil and it goes like the clappers, it's taken a couple of rides to sort out but it holds tight and high on the face on take off, needs waves with some punch, the rail reminds me of an old Bonzer Egg 6'6 I had that I creased but loved the hold and drive of that board. This board is as fast.
- Cpt.Caveman
- barnacle
- Posts: 1594
- Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 9:13 am
- Location: Sydney - Everywhere and nowhere.
Re: Neal Purchase Jnr Quartet
They look fun, but I reckon they would go better as twinzers.
Then again, I'm frothing on twinzers right now and pretty twinzer obsessed.
Then again, I'm frothing on twinzers right now and pretty twinzer obsessed.
Davros wrote:Ego saved - surfing experience rubbish.
Re: Neal Purchase Jnr Quartet
Always been interested in Pavel Speed Dialler, anyone have one or ridden?
Re: Neal Purchase Jnr Quartet
he's a hard man to get hold of and with a long waiting list.
Hatchnam wrote:
Filthy little hipster.
Re: Neal Purchase Jnr Quartet
Thanks Saltman, I have heard the same thing re: fav board ever a few times, I think Pavel was in Sydney last year but not sure if he was shaping.
Re: Neal Purchase Jnr Quartet
Haven't ridden one but I saw a couple of Pavel's in the dues ex machina store in byron bay about a month ago, not sure if they were speed dialers. Give them a call. They looked nice I gave them a quick fondle saw the price & walked away (over a grand from memory)Davros wrote:Always been interested in Pavel Speed Dialler, anyone have one or ridden?
Davros: "But it felt a bit long and stiff"
Re: Neal Purchase Jnr Quartet
How much is a new quartet?
Live in the sunshine, swim the sea, drink the wild air.
Re: Neal Purchase Jnr Quartet
Aye, ya wanna da hand a shape or da popout a shape a like a da Loofy gone an got.JET01 wrote:How much is a new quartet?
The moving finger writes and having writ moves on ... now all thy piety nor wit shall lure it back to cancel even half a line ... nor all thy tears wash out a single word of it.
Re: Neal Purchase Jnr Quartet
anywhere between $870-1100 - depending on glassing, spray and courier.
Hatchnam wrote:
Filthy little hipster.
Re: Neal Purchase Jnr Quartet
Yeah what Batoes said. If you drive off the front foot a lot it can be a bit weird to get used to but once you do, a cracking board.
Trev wrote:I have always had a lot of time for Dick
smnmntll wrote:Got one in the mouth once, that was pretty memorable
Re: Neal Purchase Jnr Quartet
Cheers. A bit more excy than your average board, nothing like the price of a JD shape thoughbatoes wrote:anywhere between $870-1100 - depending on glassing, spray and courier.
Happy to pay for quality. A tight arse pays twice.
Live in the sunshine, swim the sea, drink the wild air.
Re: Neal Purchase Jnr Quartet
This. Virtually unbreakable, undentable, and ride well.Beerfan wrote:JDs are worth every cent.
Re: Neal Purchase Jnr Quartet
Great combination.
My Quartet just keeps getting better and better. So smooth and drivey, no monkey pumping.
My Quartet just keeps getting better and better. So smooth and drivey, no monkey pumping.
Trev wrote:I have always had a lot of time for Dick
smnmntll wrote:Got one in the mouth once, that was pretty memorable
Re: Neal Purchase Jnr Quartet
Hey quartet riders when you mean they ride best with a narrow stance do you mean back foot a bit forward, say compared to back foot back over a thruster's fin cluster?
Re: Neal Purchase Jnr Quartet
Either or I reckon
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests