Pics:North Coast

Can't find the right forum, then post your general surf-related remarks here!

Moderators: jimmy, collnarra, PeepeelaPew, Butts, beach_defender, Shari, Forum Moderators

sparky_12
regular
Posts: 309
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2005 7:57 am
Location: Sand Dunes
Contact:

Pics:North Coast

Post by sparky_12 » Tue Jan 16, 2007 10:28 am

Heres a few pics i took over the last week Travelling

1
Image

2
Image

3
Image

4
Image

5
Image

6
Image

7
Image

8
Image

9
Image

10
Image

11
Image

12
Image

13
Image

14
Image

enjoy : )

User avatar
Kunji
Huey's Right Hand
Posts: 30991
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 11:10 am
Location: 40 - nil

Post by Kunji » Tue Jan 16, 2007 10:32 am

Hey Sparky, they are awesome pics! :)

Did you go out any of those reefs? 7 & 8 looks awesome.

sparky_12
regular
Posts: 309
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2005 7:57 am
Location: Sand Dunes
Contact:

Post by sparky_12 » Tue Jan 16, 2007 11:04 am

Coops@DY wrote:Hey Sparky, they are awesome pics! :)

Did you go out any of those reefs? 7 & 8 looks awesome.
i was shooting some friends that day but it was unridable, ill post up the footage later which shows how big it is

User avatar
stinky_wes
regular
Posts: 367
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 3:06 pm
Location: anywhere without a crowd

Post by stinky_wes » Tue Jan 16, 2007 11:29 am

Nice view from the top of the hill in #14.
I think i might haul my lazy arse up there next time i head up for a surf... if i can be farked (highly unlikely)

stoive
barnacle
Posts: 2414
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2005 7:22 pm

Post by stoive » Tue Jan 16, 2007 12:09 pm

nice pics, 7,14 for me

HairY_SteveN

Post by HairY_SteveN » Tue Jan 16, 2007 12:16 pm

dude...no. 3. that is the worst foto i have ever seen. and all those waves are shit.

User avatar
Butts
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 3929
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 11:44 am
Location: Serenity

Post by Butts » Tue Jan 16, 2007 12:45 pm

Sparky, #14 nice 8)

User avatar
Crofty
Grommet
Posts: 43
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 10:46 am
Location: Northern Beaches

Post by Crofty » Tue Jan 16, 2007 1:22 pm

Where is number 14??? Place looks amazing!

stoive
barnacle
Posts: 2414
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2005 7:22 pm

Post by stoive » Tue Jan 16, 2007 3:44 pm

HairY_SteveN wrote:dude...no. 3. that is the worst foto i have ever seen. and all those waves are shit.
here we go again

reggie

Post by reggie » Tue Jan 16, 2007 4:41 pm

HairY_SteveN wrote:dude...no. 3. that is the worst foto i have ever seen. and all those waves are shit.
lighten up hairymonster, he's not trying to be a pro. his sister on the other hand :wink:

barstardos
charger
Posts: 905
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2004 2:47 pm
Location: Queenscliff

Post by barstardos » Tue Jan 16, 2007 5:14 pm

Ive said it before, the Port Stephens area is the most useless surfing coastline in NSW. Sure it has potential - but it never reaches it!
So many times all the elements are there, swell - good, wind - offshore, tide - just right, surf - not that good!
So many times I am up there (visting in-laws) and just are skunked for waves when the rest of the East coast is cranking.
It just lacks the right reefs, banks and points that other places have.
I am going to have to ask the in-laws to move to the south coast

barstardos
charger
Posts: 905
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2004 2:47 pm
Location: Queenscliff

Post by barstardos » Wed Jan 17, 2007 9:56 am

Funny you should mention that Bawley Point has similar rocks, Guard.

Bawley is geologically very interesting, its small intrusion of Essexite, a type volcanic balloons of magma that that cystallises to rock forming these nice rounded domes, creating the graduated reefs of the Point and Gillo's.

Port Stephens is similar however the intrusions of Trachyandesite (mineralogically very similar to Essexite) were formed more inside large volcanic pipes. So the shape of the intrusions are large, vertical and blocky leading to crappy reef shapes and a convoluted coastline that does not create gradually sloping points and reefs we need to turn swell in to epic surf.

Sorry, I cant help being a geological nerd sometime.
I think I might have to go back to uni and do my PhD on "Geological control of coastal reef formation and its implications for the shape of surfing waves". It would require at least 3 years of extensive fieldwork!
Right, I am now lookings for a research grant - anyone?

User avatar
Butts
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 3929
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 11:44 am
Location: Serenity

Post by Butts » Wed Jan 17, 2007 10:21 am

barstardos wrote:Funny you should mention that Bawley Point has similar rocks, Guard.

Bawley is geologically very interesting, its small intrusion of Essexite, a type volcanic balloons of magma that that cystallises to rock forming these nice rounded domes, creating the graduated reefs of the Point and Gillo's.

Port Stephens is similar however the intrusions of Trachyandesite (mineralogically very similar to Essexite) were formed more inside large volcanic pipes. So the shape of the intrusions are large, vertical and blocky leading to crappy reef shapes and a convoluted coastline that does not create gradually sloping points and reefs we need to turn swell in to epic surf.

Sorry, I cant help being a geological nerd sometime.
I think I might have to go back to uni and do my PhD on "Geological control of coastal reef formation and its implications for the shape of surfing waves". It would require at least 3 years of extensive fieldwork!
Right, I am now lookings for a research grant - anyone?
You'll need an assistant to help document :wink:

2nd Reef
Harry the Hat
Posts: 3032
Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 12:14 pm
Location: Pau Malu

Post by 2nd Reef » Wed Jan 17, 2007 10:38 am

barstardos wrote:Funny you should mention that Bawley Point has similar rocks, Guard.

Bawley is geologically very interesting, its small intrusion of Essexite, a type volcanic balloons of magma that that cystallises to rock forming these nice rounded domes, creating the graduated reefs of the Point and Gillo's.

Port Stephens is similar however the intrusions of Trachyandesite (mineralogically very similar to Essexite) were formed more inside large volcanic pipes. So the shape of the intrusions are large, vertical and blocky leading to crappy reef shapes and a convoluted coastline that does not create gradually sloping points and reefs we need to turn swell in to epic surf.

Sorry, I cant help being a geological nerd sometime.
I think I might have to go back to uni and do my PhD on "Geological control of coastal reef formation and its implications for the shape of surfing waves". It would require at least 3 years of extensive fieldwork!
Right, I am now lookings for a research grant - anyone?
Interesting stuff B-man. You got any info on the Great Lakes area? Cos all the headlands from Forster Main Beach to Treachery have similar characteristics (sloping sedimentary layers) that aren't found in the wider area. As you would well know, that stretch of coast is renowned for good waves. There are however, no good point breaks (Seal Rocks & Haydens aside), nor reef breaks. Seems to me the type of rock is conducive to having deep water just offshore cos the headlands drop off very quickly. This would explain why there are no point breaks.

Also, the coast has many turns and faces different directions. I've wondered if that was due to the type of rock in the area.

Your 2nd Assistant
2nd Reef.

User avatar
muggo
regular
Posts: 135
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:24 pm

Post by muggo » Wed Jan 17, 2007 11:30 am

Nice, some heavy waves there!

A tip: try and keep the horizon horizontal

barstardos
charger
Posts: 905
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2004 2:47 pm
Location: Queenscliff

Post by barstardos » Wed Jan 17, 2007 11:38 am

Now you got me started 2nd research assistant. The Great lakes area geologically within the New England fold belt, a very complex region extending all way up in to Qld. Even worse, it was the subject of my Honours thesis in geology!
Breifly, this region has been formed by the accretion of oceanic rocks and island arcs to the Australian continent between 540My and 220My. The end result is broad band of tightly folded rocks, many of very different types quite close together.
In the Great Lakes region the rocks are not so tightly folded, they are Permian sediments that form sometimes thick beds including sandstones and where they are not vertical, or gently dipping you can gets some OK reefs - but not many.
Other areas with vertical thin bedded sediments dont get good reefs (eg Batemans Bay or Coffs Harbour).
Areas with gently sloping, medum bedded sandstones seem to get excellent reefs (eg Sydney, Shellharbour, Ulladulla). In this case DY Point and Cronulla Point should be considered bedrock reefs, not Points
Sand and Boulder Points are a whole different issue and relate more to coastal geomorpholgy and sediment flow rather than bedrock reef shape.

mad
charger
Posts: 904
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2004 3:49 pm
Location: shedarama

Post by mad » Wed Jan 17, 2007 11:53 am

B'os, like to here you're take on what I think is the basalt based points up on the far north coast, which emanated from the Mt warning flows.

Have you got any links on this stuff :?:

I've also recently read claims that tsunami action has influenced the shape of some of the north coast coastline south of Byron, pointing to scars and scouring as examples. Never chased up the info at the time unfortunately

User avatar
Grooter
Duke Status
Posts: 11261
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 12:37 pm
Location: Titan Uranus

Post by Grooter » Wed Jan 17, 2007 1:05 pm

How about some lyrical waxing on Vics reefs guys?

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 42 guests