Bong in big trouble

Can't find the right forum, then post your general surf-related remarks here!

Moderators: jimmy, collnarra, PeepeelaPew, Butts, beach_defender, Shari, Forum Moderators

User avatar
oldman
Snowy McAllister
Posts: 6886
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2004 1:11 pm
Location: Probably Maroubra, goddammit!

Re: Bong in big trouble

Post by oldman » Wed Dec 19, 2012 3:26 pm

Nick Carroll wrote:I don't know but maybe this is part of why Derek was in Hawaii...

http://www.smh.com.au/business/buyout-c ... 2bj93.html

when a smart business writer like Ms Ferguson starts talking up private ownership, it's worth paying attention.
I don't rate Ferguson as a business writer at all, and not much chop for Malcolm Maiden either. Caught both of them out repeatedly just passing on gossip that a well informed bowling ball would have seen through.

Pity that Ian Verrender left, he had some smarts about him.

As for Bong, it may well go to private ownership, but that hardly means that it's gone, that just means a new owner. Nothing else likely to change.

And as for their current woes, sure the internet was a factor, but the bigger problem was structural. It was a poorly managed company, forget everything else. They invested hugely just at the wrong time, and they created a thousand brands all under one roof. Logistics, ordering, clothing lines, suppliers, all over the place.

There's a lot of blue sky there for a genuine business person, certainly huge room for improvement. Inman may not be a surfie chick, but I think she might be a retailer with some experience. She will certainly improve it if she gets the time, and if she doesn't, the private owners will be able to improve it.
Lucky Al wrote:You could call your elbows borogoves, and your knees bandersnatches, and go whiffling through the tulgey woods north of narrabeen, burbling as you came.

User avatar
dUg
barnacle
Posts: 1858
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2004 8:22 am
Location: sitting in my car waiting for someone else to paddle out first

Re: Bong in big trouble

Post by dUg » Thu Dec 20, 2012 1:47 pm

oldman wrote:
As for Bong, it may well go to private ownership, but that hardly means that it's gone, that just means a new owner. Nothing else likely to change.
You reckon Naude might try for a share buy-back / delist Olds?

Hollowed out
regular
Posts: 302
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2011 4:36 pm

Re: Bong in big trouble

Post by Hollowed out » Fri Dec 21, 2012 1:43 pm

Hot rumour around Bong that the long time CFO out the door today effective immediately.
Not confirmed officially so just talk at this stage but if true it will hurt their value.

User avatar
dUg
barnacle
Posts: 1858
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2004 8:22 am
Location: sitting in my car waiting for someone else to paddle out first

Re: Bong in big trouble

Post by dUg » Fri Dec 21, 2012 2:21 pm

Hollowed out wrote:Hot rumour around Bong that the long time CFO out the door today effective immediately.
Not confirmed officially so just talk at this stage but if true it will hurt their value.
Fact as of yesterday...

http://www.news.com.au/business/breakin ... 6541372625
Billabong said Mr White departed on Thursday and Peter Bryant, the company's chief financial officer of the Americas, had been temporarily appointed to the role.
Bryant would be reasonably tight with Naude, wouldn't you think?

User avatar
kayu
Local
Posts: 612
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 1:24 pm

Re: Bong in big trouble

Post by kayu » Mon Dec 24, 2012 5:30 pm

Decision day looms for Billabong

by Stephen Bartholomeusz

Published 11:41 AM, 24 Dec 2012



The board of Billabong now appears open to the notion of embracing an offer from a consortium led by the president of its Americas business that it would probably have rejected out of hand only a few months ago.

The board today announced that, having reviewed in detail the "confidential, indicative, non-binding and conditional" proposal from Paul Naude and his backers, Sycamore Partners Management and Bank of America Merrill Lynch, it would grant the consortium access to due diligence.

Conventionally boards and their advisers only give prospective bidders access to due diligence if either the indicative price is clearly in their ballpark of value or they have traded access to get a bump in the level of the proposed offer.

Once a bidder has been granted access the target company has lost a lot of its negotiating leverage, although it does still have a board recommendation to trade for some concession from an aspiring bidder.

Billabong hasn’t extracted anything more from the consortium yet in terms of the prospective offer price, which remains at the $1.10 a share level which Naude originally pitched to the board.

The Naude consortium will be the third private equity-sponsored group to conduct due diligence on Billabong. Both TPG and Bain Capital had a look inside Billabong and walked away, decisions confirmed by the subsequent implosions in Billabong’s earnings.

Last week Billabong, in confirming that the Naude group had made an indicative offer, announced an earnings downgrade. Where previously it had provided guidance of earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation of between $100 million and $110 million, it said it now expected underlying earnings to be between $85 million and $92 million.

While it isn’t alone – all the surfwear/lifestyle apparel retailers are struggling to cope with the retail recession that has emerged globally – Billabong’s downward earnings spiral, the succession of approaches at tumbling indicative prices and its capital raisings under duress have generated considerable hostility within its shareholder base.

Relatively new chief executive Launa Inman has outlined an alternative to succumbing to an offer at a low point in Billabong’s history – she has articulated a strategic plan that would, if executed well, unlock more than $155 million of incremental earnings – but it is a four-year plan that wouldn’t be completed until 2016.

Given the choice of $1.10 of cash today and holding out in the hope than Inman can actually deliver a restructured and far more profitable Billabong in 2016 there are plenty of shareholders who will opt for certainty even as they recognise the potential opportunity cost of selling out at a low point in the group‘s history and share price.

There is, of course, no certainty that a bid will emerge from the due diligence process but Naude, presiding over an Americas division which is one of Billabong’s core businesses and one which is experiencing problems and, until he stood aside, a director of the group, would have a better grasp of Billabong’s condition and potential than the private equity firms that preceded him into the company’s data room.

Billabong said today that the due diligence process (which is non-exclusive) would take up to six weeks, so its likely fate should be known around the end of January or early February. That will make for a less than relaxing Christmas and New Year season for Inman and her team and an anxious wait for Billabong’s employees and shareholders.......... 3-)

Nick Carroll
Huey's Right Hand
Posts: 26515
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2005 9:29 am
Location: Newport Beach

Re: Bong in big trouble

Post by Nick Carroll » Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:01 pm

jesus christmas get it over with already

http://www.smh.com.au/business/bain-alu ... 2cqos.html

collnarra
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 2327
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2004 8:57 am

Re: Bong in big trouble

Post by collnarra » Tue Jan 15, 2013 2:40 pm

I agree, NC. It would be the story that just keeps on giving - if it wasn't so boring.
the tools of the trade are the head and the heart - mission of burma

User avatar
offshore1
Duke Status
Posts: 17756
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2005 12:40 am

Re: Bong in big trouble

Post by offshore1 » Wed Jan 16, 2013 8:02 am

My boy was wearing an RVCA t-shirt today, my missus , sick of my salvo boardies, bought me a pair of RVCA boardshorts.
I asked my son if he knew what the fcuk RVCA meant.
Being of the droid generation he whipped out his smartphone and told me:


the company is under the umbrella of Billabong,
the "V" in RVCA is "U" in Greek,
RUCA means 'clothes' in Greek,
apparently it also means "old woman' in Spanish.


you're welcome.
marauding mullet wrote:
Wed May 31, 2023 6:03 pm
Jesus I’m surrounded by schnitzel tards.

daryl
Huey's Right Hand
Posts: 27156
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2005 6:23 pm

Re: Bong in big trouble

Post by daryl » Wed Jan 16, 2013 8:25 am

thought Vans were buying it

User avatar
offshore1
Duke Status
Posts: 17756
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2005 12:40 am

Re: Bong in big trouble

Post by offshore1 » Wed Jan 16, 2013 8:33 am

daryl wrote:thought Vans were buying it
do you mean "Uans," the greek shoe company
marauding mullet wrote:
Wed May 31, 2023 6:03 pm
Jesus I’m surrounded by schnitzel tards.

Nick Carroll
Huey's Right Hand
Posts: 26515
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2005 9:29 am
Location: Newport Beach

Re: Bong in big trouble

Post by Nick Carroll » Wed Jan 16, 2013 3:36 pm

VF, the corporation that's part of the latest bid, owns Vans along with all sorts of middle-quality clothing/gear brands: The North Face, Timberland, etc. They're pretty good at running those companies, they'd probably do a good job with BBong, but they're pretty US centric.

Hollowed out
regular
Posts: 302
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2011 4:36 pm

Re: Bong in big trouble

Post by Hollowed out » Wed Jan 16, 2013 6:07 pm

trouble with Vans /VF is that they plan to break Bong up and that would have dire consequences all round IMHO. Oz will be shafted and like QS we will loose a part of oz surfing support and an icon for qld .
Prolly would mean oz HQ shut down and loss of oz jobs. Parko et al are x sponsored by Bongs brands and that would mean all the sub brands being run by a seperate VC who will just rape those brands for every buck which could spell death for them and their respective staff.
In all best for all if Nuade's mob get it and piss the board and investors off and go back to a private run company with the core surf crew running it albiet they will still have to keep their backers happy.

Glamarama
regular
Posts: 119
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2012 2:34 pm

Re: Bong in big trouble

Post by Glamarama » Fri Jan 18, 2013 12:49 pm

such simple genius HO.

im surprised with your interest and intimate knowledge a consortium hasnt sourced you to be part of a bid for bong.

you can employ roy as chief shaper.

Hollowed out
regular
Posts: 302
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2011 4:36 pm

Re: Bong in big trouble

Post by Hollowed out » Fri Feb 22, 2013 2:53 pm

looks like Naude may pick up Bong for a song
Billabong reveals debt woes, posts huge loss
Date
February 22, 2013 - 11:54AM
15 reading nowRead later

inShare
submit to redditEmail articlePrint
Troubled surfwear retailer Billabong has downgraded its expectations for underlying earnings in the full year after posting a $537 million dollar first-half loss and reported that it breached its debt covenants following huge writedowns.

The company also says it's continuing discussions with two parties that have made takeover offers for the company, and due diligence is scheduled to conclude at the end of March.

Billabong's net loss in the six months to December 31 compares to a $16 million dollar profit in the previous corresponding period. The result included $567 million in impairments to the company's brands and value, most of which was not in cash terms, Billabong said.

The company's shares were down as much as 7.1 per cent, but recovered to be 4.4 per cent lower to 87 cents shortly before 11am today. No interim dividend will be paid.

Advertisement
Billabong CEO Laura Inman backed away from one of the key targets of her transformation strategy for the leisurewear group - a promised $239 million in earnings before interest tax depreciation and amortisation by the 2016 financial year.

‘‘I’m not going to comment on that,’’ Ms Inman told analysts on a conference call when asked if the target was still achievable.

She added that the main focus at this stage is stabilising the business and getting the right people in place.

Debt woes

The surf and streetwear retailer revealed that it was in breach of its debt covenants thanks to $567 million worth of writedowns for the half year ending December 31, efffectively leaving it at the mercy of its banks. The situation has since been remedied but at a price.

Billabong said it has agreed to move ‘‘as soon as practicable’’ to a secured banking arrangement with its financiers ‘‘whereby the company will grant security over the majority of its assets’’.

The breach forced Billabong to classify $270 million of borrowings as current liabilities on its balance sheet.

Sales revenue fell in the period as conditions remained difficult, particularly in Europe, it said in a statement on Friday.

The company now expects its underlying earnings in the year to June 30 to be between $74 million and $85 million, down from its previous guidance of $85 million to $92 million.

Chief executive Launa Inman also said the benefits of the company’s reduction in stores and suppliers would not be seen in the 2012/13 financial year.



Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/business/billabon ... z2Lb2QgU7A

Natho
barnacle
Posts: 2344
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 11:21 am
Location: In the pit

Re: Bong in big trouble

Post by Natho » Fri Feb 22, 2013 3:43 pm

I have it from a very good source that there will be some 'big' news re Rip Curl soon. Well it is part old news because a few things have been on the cards re Rip Curl for a while which the media has already reported, however there are now a few twists and turns. Watch this space. There you go HO something else for you to sink your teeth into. go get em.

Nick Carroll
Huey's Right Hand
Posts: 26515
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2005 9:29 am
Location: Newport Beach

Re: Bong in big trouble

Post by Nick Carroll » Sat Feb 23, 2013 2:57 pm

chances of the Bong suitors paying $1.10 now for the company: zero.

actually they'll prolly finish the due diligence and run for the hills.

Hollowed out
regular
Posts: 302
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2011 4:36 pm

Re: Bong in big trouble

Post by Hollowed out » Thu Mar 21, 2013 3:18 pm

Nick Carroll wrote:chances of the Bong suitors paying $1.10 now for the company: zero.

actually they'll prolly finish the due diligence and run for the hills.
Turns out a very good call Nick according to SMH today...pity about that Newport bloke who bought heaps at $1.10 and swore he would clean up
Billabong shares slump before trading halt
Date
March 21, 2013 - 2:44PM
39 reading nowRead later

Colin Kruger
Business Reporter
View more articles from Colin Kruger
Email Colin

inShare
Pin Itsubmit to redditEmail articlePrint

Dumped ... Billabong's share price tumbles. Photo: Ian Waldie
Billabong has gone into a trading halt after shares crashed to a record low, suggesting the company will not get a formal takeover offer from either of its private equity suitors which are due to finish due diligence next week.

It is understood that trading could recommence as early as today once the company has confirmed the status of the two offers.

In a statement to the ASX Billabong requested its shares be placed in a trading halt until Monday March 25 or ‘‘when the company makes an announcement’’ to the market.

The company indicated it had no information that would explain the stock plunge.

Advertisement
‘‘The trading halt is requested pending an investigation by the company into trading levels today,’’ the company said today. Billabong, Australia’s largest sports-wear company, fell to a record low of 63 cents, the lowest level since an August 2000 stock-market listing, and were trading at 69.5 cents when the trading halt was called.

Two groups, consisting of Altamont Capital Partners and VF Corp. on one side and Sycamore Partners Management and Billabong Americas head Paul Naude on the other, have said they may offer $1.10 for the Gold Coast-based company, valuing the business at $527 million.

Analysts had expected the two parties come back with lower offers around the 90 cents mark but the current price reflects a scenario where both parties walk away from Billabong.

Credit Suisse recently reassessed the company’s valuation on the basis that bids fail to emerge and gave the company a weighted valuation of 59 cents per share.

At its half year results Billabong said it expects to conclude the bidding process either way by the end of this month, which effectively gives the suitors until next Thursday to either put a firm offer on the table or walk away.

The company last month posted a record loss on $567 million of charges as it wrote off most of the value of its main brand. Billabong will post 80 per cent of its assets and 85 per cent of its earnings as security to its lenders after brand and goodwill writedowns put it in breach of terms on its debt, it said at the time.



Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/business/billabon ... z2O9171MNa

Nick Carroll
Huey's Right Hand
Posts: 26515
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2005 9:29 am
Location: Newport Beach

Re: Bong in big trouble

Post by Nick Carroll » Thu Mar 21, 2013 4:13 pm

phew just as well I never take my own advice

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 135 guests