Which FCS?
Moderators: jimmy, collnarra, PeepeelaPew, Butts, Shari, Forum Moderators
Which FCS?
Hi
Looking for advice on which FCS fins to run on my new board. The board is a JS Evolution 5/11 19.2 2.38.
http://jsindustries.com/surfboards-v2/evolution
Options for both thruster and quad.
Appreciate any helpful comments
Cheers
T x
Looking for advice on which FCS fins to run on my new board. The board is a JS Evolution 5/11 19.2 2.38.
http://jsindustries.com/surfboards-v2/evolution
Options for both thruster and quad.
Appreciate any helpful comments
Cheers
T x
Re: Which FCS?
What is your question?
Whether to get thruster or quad, or what fins to run?
I would probably ride it as a thruster, no idea what sort of fins.
Whether to get thruster or quad, or what fins to run?
I would probably ride it as a thruster, no idea what sort of fins.
-
- Harry the Hat
- Posts: 2599
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 9:29 pm
Re: Which FCS?
If the board is set up for lift and speed than for me, I'd ride it as a quaddy. How big are you?
If you're around (or less) the 80kg mark then try the K2.1s as a quad (or use the K2.1s thruster in the front and G1000s in the back). If this is too loose for your liking then try the M3's in the front and G1000s in the rear.
If you're around (or less) the 80kg mark then try the K2.1s as a quad (or use the K2.1s thruster in the front and G1000s in the back). If this is too loose for your liking then try the M3's in the front and G1000s in the rear.
Re: Which FCS?
Ok cool. I'm 78kg. I have a set of k2.1s already. I will ride it first as a thruster then experiment with the quad option down the track, as I have little experience riding quads. Thanks
-
- Harry the Hat
- Posts: 2599
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 9:29 pm
Re: Which FCS?
If it's a McKee quad fin setup, you won't go back to a thruster!!!
Re: Which FCS?
Riding it as a thruster will allow you to feel the board out well. You can then change it up to a quad to feel the difference and see if you like it. Depends on what you like to get out of a board. Thruster will be more predictable and better for quick direction changes and top to bottom type surfing in my opinion. Quad will probably be a bit faster down the line and hold in a bit better. Depends how you surf and type of waves too. Also depends on how the quad is set up. With the back fins set in closer to the stringer it will surf a bit closer to a thruster anyway. Further out towards the rail and it will feel a but more like a twinny.
As far as type of fins don't get caught up in a lot of the fin company marketing crap. As a thruster any board should work pretty well with a base set of say PC or PG 5's or similar ( K2 1 s will be fine). As a quad you probably need to be a bit more picky about fin combos and try some variations to see what works. Don's suggestion is a good one to start.
As far as type of fins don't get caught up in a lot of the fin company marketing crap. As a thruster any board should work pretty well with a base set of say PC or PG 5's or similar ( K2 1 s will be fine). As a quad you probably need to be a bit more picky about fin combos and try some variations to see what works. Don's suggestion is a good one to start.
Re: Which FCS?
Much obliged fellas. Can't wait to get on it.
Re: Which FCS?
Hey mate, I'd be interested to see what you think of the Evo, I'm picking one up tomorrow the exact same Dims as yours.
I was planning on riding it as a thruster with the Julian Wilson fins (cross between k2.1 and the pc-5's)
Maybe a quad might go better in the bigger stuff, just adding a bit more hold and drive.
Praying for swell on the goldy atm.
I was planning on riding it as a thruster with the Julian Wilson fins (cross between k2.1 and the pc-5's)
Maybe a quad might go better in the bigger stuff, just adding a bit more hold and drive.
Praying for swell on the goldy atm.
Re: Which FCS?
I have seen a post heat interview with Kelly where he said that fin size had more to do with tail width than weight, thats why he uses a 5th fin sometimes.
Obviously a bigger guy will have a wider tail and will benefit from a bigger fin (i.e PC 7 = 85kgs and up). so the indications from the fin manufacturers using weight ranges makes kind of sense.
Have seen a lot of 80kgs or less surfers with smaller boards (sometimes having a wider tail and outline) using PC7, well more specifically using the GAM (Merrick large template blue fins).
Another big clue is that big wave guns 10ft plus have smaller fins compared to rail length and I think it has a lot to do with the narrow to super narrow pin tails they have.
I am 80kgs and have done some testing between PC5 and PC7 (or GAMs) and I really get more drive out of the GAM, mind you this template has got a slightly smaller trailer fin which really helps, best FCS template I have tested in my opinion.
For Quad , the K2.1 does the job as overall I have more fin area anyways.
good luck and go test a few fins
J
Obviously a bigger guy will have a wider tail and will benefit from a bigger fin (i.e PC 7 = 85kgs and up). so the indications from the fin manufacturers using weight ranges makes kind of sense.
Have seen a lot of 80kgs or less surfers with smaller boards (sometimes having a wider tail and outline) using PC7, well more specifically using the GAM (Merrick large template blue fins).
Another big clue is that big wave guns 10ft plus have smaller fins compared to rail length and I think it has a lot to do with the narrow to super narrow pin tails they have.
I am 80kgs and have done some testing between PC5 and PC7 (or GAMs) and I really get more drive out of the GAM, mind you this template has got a slightly smaller trailer fin which really helps, best FCS template I have tested in my opinion.
For Quad , the K2.1 does the job as overall I have more fin area anyways.
good luck and go test a few fins
J
Re: Which FCS?
Has anyone tried the fcs origin fins or heard what they're like ?
- Cpt.Caveman
- barnacle
- Posts: 1594
- Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 9:13 am
- Location: Sydney - Everywhere and nowhere.
Re: Which FCS?
I feel sorry for Powerbase Fins, they obviousy couldn't patent their fin base idea strongly enough to avoid FCS from basically copying the idea. Its basically the same except powerbase still fits in normal FCS plugs.
Davros wrote:Ego saved - surfing experience rubbish.
Re: Which FCS?
Hi Capt,
Are the powerbase fins good, I miss the feeling of glassed in fins. I was looking at fcs origin but only 3 types of fins available with just small and medium sizes.
Are the powerbase fins good, I miss the feeling of glassed in fins. I was looking at fcs origin but only 3 types of fins available with just small and medium sizes.
-
- Huey's Right Hand
- Posts: 26515
- Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2005 9:29 am
- Location: Newport Beach
Re: Which FCS?
Base refit fins are boring.
Futures is the best system if your main issue is the idea that base strength makes the big difference. It's a fcuken good system anyway.
FCS 2 has more base support and is piss easy to use, click in and go.
I think people who still claim glass on fins are missing out, like what do you really think is happening with fins. If you don't experience a loss of fin edge at Sunset and Teahupoo - and I know I haven't - then do you really think there's some advantage to be gained at 3' snapper or whatever.
If you want to fine tune your board via fins you need a system, so you can switch fin templates, and ideally, positions. Fcs2 and Futures still let us down on this second score.
I suspect pretty much any board will go better if the frontside rail fin is a quarter of an inch further forward than the backside rail fin. Every single board I've been able to do this on has gone way better. But if you're not using Surffinz or a similar box in which you can shift fins up and down, you can't try it.
Futures is the best system if your main issue is the idea that base strength makes the big difference. It's a fcuken good system anyway.
FCS 2 has more base support and is piss easy to use, click in and go.
I think people who still claim glass on fins are missing out, like what do you really think is happening with fins. If you don't experience a loss of fin edge at Sunset and Teahupoo - and I know I haven't - then do you really think there's some advantage to be gained at 3' snapper or whatever.
If you want to fine tune your board via fins you need a system, so you can switch fin templates, and ideally, positions. Fcs2 and Futures still let us down on this second score.
I suspect pretty much any board will go better if the frontside rail fin is a quarter of an inch further forward than the backside rail fin. Every single board I've been able to do this on has gone way better. But if you're not using Surffinz or a similar box in which you can shift fins up and down, you can't try it.
Re: Which FCS?
Hey Nick thanks for the reply.
A bit to think about there, those surffinz fins are interesting but I might spend more time playing around and tweaking them than surfing.
I really haven't changed the type of fins I use for a while, but I keep busting the fcs plugs through the deck(from compression dings mainly) which is probably due to not enough glass though. I may have the same problem with other systems too, but I thought there were probably better systems to have a look at.
A bit to think about there, those surffinz fins are interesting but I might spend more time playing around and tweaking them than surfing.
I really haven't changed the type of fins I use for a while, but I keep busting the fcs plugs through the deck(from compression dings mainly) which is probably due to not enough glass though. I may have the same problem with other systems too, but I thought there were probably better systems to have a look at.
-
- Huey's Right Hand
- Posts: 26515
- Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2005 9:29 am
- Location: Newport Beach
Re: Which FCS?
^^ha ha yeah you can waste a lot of time mucking around with fins
Try using a tail pad to protect your board from the plug bust through thing.
The FCS2 doesn't connect with the deck so it's prolly less of an issue in that regard.
Try using a tail pad to protect your board from the plug bust through thing.
The FCS2 doesn't connect with the deck so it's prolly less of an issue in that regard.
Re: Which FCS?
Nick Carroll wrote:Base refit fins are boring.
Futures is the best system if your main issue is the idea that base strength makes the big difference. It's a fcuken good system anyway.
FCS 2 has more base support and is piss easy to use, click in and go.
I think people who still claim glass on fins are missing out, like what do you really think is happening with fins. If you don't experience a loss of fin edge at Sunset and Teahupoo - and I know I haven't - then do you really think there's some advantage to be gained at 3' snapper or whatever.
If you want to fine tune your board via fins you need a system, so you can switch fin templates, and ideally, positions. Fcs2 and Futures still let us down on this second score.
I suspect pretty much any board will go better if the frontside rail fin is a quarter of an inch further forward than the backside rail fin. Every single board I've been able to do this on has gone way better. But if you're not using Surffinz or a similar box in which you can shift fins up and down, you can't try it.
I've got the Surfinz and will try that. Thanks Nick.
-
- Huey's Right Hand
- Posts: 26515
- Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2005 9:29 am
- Location: Newport Beach
Re: Which FCS?
^^ cool let us know.
you'll feel it more as the waves get a bit bigger, ie 3' and more
you'll feel it more as the waves get a bit bigger, ie 3' and more
-
- That's Not Believable
- Posts: 68730
- Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2005 8:21 am
- Location: Button Factory
Re: Which FCS?
Does that mean front side and back side to the wave or the way you surf i.e. goofy or natural?
Put your big boy pants on
I mean, tastebuds? WGAF?
I mean, tastebuds? WGAF?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 47 guests