jfdi wrote:- Most 4 fin design have the rear ones closer to the outside rail, but Natho finds that having them more towards the centre is better. Fin placement and type of fins can make a very noticeable difference, so seems still more to do in this area to find out what type of placement design exactly does.
Here's one reason why Natho likes his back set closer to the stringer:
One of the weird things you immediately encounter with a typical rail-set quad is a lack of feeling for the centre line of the board.
That intuitive sense of the centre line is one of the cues a good surfer uses to place the beginnings and ends of turns. On a thruster, the centre can be very clearly felt through the centre fin, as a result you know just where everything is as a turn finishes or starts.
On the old school twinnies a la MR, the centre could clearly be felt (perhaps bit too much!) via the gigantic vee they used to stick through the fins and tail.
But on the mod quad, with its rail-set fins and flat or single concave release through the tail, there's no surface change in the centre of the tail area by which you can feel the board coming back to its midpoint before and after turns.
You can feel a hell of a lot out on the rails, thanks to all that fin area ... whoopee! ... but bring the board back underfoot and you'll find a weird emptiness. One reason why the rail-set quad is hard to surf in vertical arcs.
You can get around this pretty easily, first by employing a double concave release through the fins, which gives you a nice little feel for that centre line where the stringer rises, quite subtle but definitely there. Second by shifting the back fin set off the rail and toward the centre, so that the fin-feel becomes a bit more diffuse and not so raily.
Lucky I dunno about stirring the debate, presenting a different though educated point of view maybe! For me a well-cut single concave thruster still holds the edge over anything else.