you can still surf 4 hours everyday and still post on this forumloco4olas wrote:hmm let's see:
$200 bucks for car $180 3rd party pty=$380
hmm rental for say 14 days @ $40/day = $560..........
I have no vested interest in a sale-go right ahead, pull the post apart-out of your own boredom and lack of better things to do-or shut up, fcuk off and stop wasting your and my time.....
Macca, as an aside I note your rego on this forum was about the same time as mine-give or take a few days-but you've posted almost 10 times as much -mate, you need to surf more........
bye
$200 car for sale
Moderators: jimmy, collnarra, PeepeelaPew, Butts, beach_defender, Shari, Forum Moderators
- One Mile Point
- Snowy McAllister
- Posts: 5643
- Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2004 5:44 pm
Have you seen the surf around Sydney the past two weeks-of course I'm furgin' angry!Squid wrote:He does seem rather madg_u_m_b_y wrote:Were you always this angry?
Last edited by loco4olas on Fri May 12, 2006 7:23 am, edited 1 time in total.
Paid $300-2 weeks ago.huz wrote:You say that your mate bought it for 200 and drove it for 2 weeks as it would have had 4 weeks rego but now he wants to sell it for 200 with 2 weeks rego.
Now really wants $250-but I put it on here for $200.
It's a great little car-doesn't look pretty with one unmatching panel-but goes well and stops well and everything works.
Matt
- yanks r us
- charger
- Posts: 798
- Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2005 9:07 am
- Location: Shelly Beach
Why, yes, yes it is , youg wanker, but I'm just a poor bogan hillbilly and it suits me just fine.yanks r us wrote:what a F**** bomb HAHAHA....
Also, as I've mentioned before, my car plays an important role in what I call 'sea cucumber defence', making me virtually impervious to carpark ripoffs.
You may know that the sea cucumber is a marine invertebrate living on the sea bottom eating detritus. When disturbed by a predator, it disgorges its insides in the most unappetizing way. Predator freaks out and leaves.
My '86 Toyota looks like shit, rust on the outside, inside door panels removed sos I can get a sticking window up or down, no seats but a driver's, sos I can fit in up to a 9' 0 .
But I don't stop there, I get an old pair of Homer Simpson underwear, dab a spot o brown shoe polish around the bum zone, and lay that over my towel, camera, wallet and keys.
Don't even bother ta lock the car.
Works a treat.
As I've said earlier, this technique only works for married men with kids;
not the phattest pimpmobile :? .
im not sure i'd want to buy a car off of such an angry human.loco4olas wrote:Have you seen the surf around Sydney the past two weeks-of course I'm furgin' angry!Squid wrote:He does seem rather madg_u_m_b_y wrote:Were you always this angry?
you're not a murderer are you?
maybe you've installed a fail point somewhere on the car, possibly acted by remote, or maybe only at high speeds.
Don't you have a conscience matt?
Or perhaps you'e this man:
http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/german ... 96076.htmlsmh wrote:A German self-confessed cannibal was jailed for life after a court in Frankfurt found him guilty of murder for killing and partly eating an allegedly willing victim he had met on the internet.
The court in the western German city of Frankfurt found that Armin Meiwes, known as the "cannibal of Rotenburg", killed his victim to satisfy his sexual urges.
But it rejected the prosecution's demand that Meiwes be disqualified for release after 15 years, as is usual for prisoners serving life sentences in Germany. This means he could, potentially, be freed in 2021.
Meiwes, 44, immediately indicated that he would appeal, signalling another round in a long legal process that has laid bare a hitherto secret market in cannibalism.
The Frankfurt trial was the second time Meiwes has been tried for killing Bernd Juergen Brandes in Rotenburg, Meiwes' home town, in western Germany in March 2001.
He was originally convicted of manslaughter and sentenced to 8½ years in prison in 2004.
But on appeal, a federal judge dismissed the sentence as too lenient and ordered a retrial on the higher charge of murder.
Meiwes, a computer technician, has insisted throughout both trials that his victim had a death wish and had begged to be killed and eaten, saying it was the "ultimate kick" that both of them were seeking.
"He had wanted everything just the way it eventually happened," he said last week.
He met Brandes after advertising on the internet for a "slaughter victim" and invited him to his farm house.
Brandes, who had written a will, bought a one-way rail ticket, while Meiwes set up a beer-tent table in his house to serve as a butcher's block.
When the two men met, they made a videotape of their fatal encounter. It showed them having sex, then Meiwes severing Brandes' penis, which the two men then fried and tried to eat.
Meiwes later stabbed his bleeding, unconscious victim in the throat and cut away other parts of his body.
He admitted he eventually ate about 20 kilograms of Brandes's flesh, accompanied by potatoes and a pepper or wine sauce, served on "good crockery".
His lawyers argued that he was not guilty of murder but rather of the crime of "killing on demand", which carries a maximum prison sentence of five years.
Psychologists told the court Meiwes was a deeply disturbed and lonely man but mentally fit to stand trial.
Meiwes testified that his fantasies about eating flesh dated back some 30 years. He said that after his father abandoned his family, he realised that he wanted to eat a school friend as a way of keeping somebody with him forever.
He has admitted recently that, even in his prison cell, he still fantasises about killing people when he sees attractive young bodies on television or in magazines.
Prosecutors said this was an indication that there was a high risk he would try to kill and eat somebody again.
Meiwes was arrested months after killing Brandes when an Austrian student noticed another internet advertisement and alerted police.
Investigators found that he had been in touch with more than 200 people who shared his fantasies, while Meiwes himself said there were about 800 cannibals in Germany who hoped to fulfil their urges.
He has urged them to seek psychological help.
His story inspired a US-made horror film called Butterfly, A Grimm Love Story, but Meiwes succeeded in blocking its release on the grounds that it was an infringement of his privacy.
Yeah the belts are used because they are smoother and the engines runs better. Chains are a lot louder and rattle too. But on the plus side they are stronger and last. The same principle applies on motor bikes.snakes wrote:Well they do wear out, but you get more kms out of them than a belt.Squid wrote:I thought timing chains never needed replacement, not like belts. At least that's what i heard buying my ancient BMW
p.s. let me guess the bee-mer is no longer going?
snakes
But you should replace them when they are due because if you don't your pistons will start dining on your valves and then it's goodbye engine.
Alternatively get a pushrod motor and you won't have this problem although refinement and fuel efficiency isn't as good
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 84 guests