Let them eat cake

[el rancho]

lol you denied gas chambers existed and 6 million Jews were exterminated, on a public forum, in between spruiking your boards.

and this is where your innocent 'research' came from

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institute ... cal_Review

The IHR published the non-peer reviewed Journal of Historical Review, which its critics (including the ADL, the Danish Center for Holocaust and Genocide studies, and other scholars, such as Robert Hanyok, a National Security Agency historian,[31] accused of being pseudo-scientific.[32]

The journal, History Teacher, wrote of the Journal of Historical Review that the "magazine is shockingly racist and antisemitic: articles on 'America's Failed Racial Policy' and anti-Israel pieces accompany those about gas chambers... They clearly have no business claiming to be a continuation of the revisionist tradition, and should be referred to as 'Holocaust Deniers'."[33]

at least be a man about it and own your part in it. or get a PR firm.

[Roy_Stewart]

lol you denied gas chambers existed and 6 million Jews were exterminated, on a public forum, in between spruiking your boards.

and this is where your innocent 'research' came from

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institute ... cal_Review

The IHR published the non-peer reviewed Journal of Historical Review, which its critics (including the ADL, the Danish Center for Holocaust and Genocide studies, and other scholars, such as Robert Hanyok, a National Security Agency historian,[31] accused of being pseudo-scientific.[32]

The journal, History Teacher, wrote of the Journal of Historical Review that the "magazine is shockingly racist and antisemitic: articles on 'America's Failed Racial Policy' and anti-Israel pieces accompany those about gas chambers... They clearly have no business claiming to be a continuation of the revisionist tradition, and should be referred to as 'Holocaust Deniers'."[33]

at least be a man about it and own your part in it. or get a PR firm.

As a matter of fact since the source which you cite is part of the official story machine, it cannot be used to refute assertions that the official story is incorrect.

You are not looking at evidence you are merely parading the official story... ergo your post fails miserably.

.

[Mr Percival]

....

[el rancho]

Five pages Roy and I still don't know what your spirit animal is.

Do you have a spirit animal?

[Mr Percival]

....

[Roy_Stewart]

Five pages Roy and I still don't know what your spirit animal is.

Do you have a spirit animal?

Yes, it's the wolf.

Hence this:

[Roy_Stewart]

And have you posted my bonza fin yet?

Yep.

[Roy_Stewart]

I abhor all forms of tyranny including fascism, communism, zionism, corporatism and the rest.

I'm not keen on organised religion either.

To that end I recommend the book 'small is beautiful' by Schumacher

[Drailed]

Five pages Roy and I still don't know what your spirit animal is.

Do you have a spirit animal?

[Mr Percival]

....

[foamy]

This thread started as a statement about challenging your internet critics, and has then demonstrated why it is probably often not a good idea.

[Roy_Stewart]

I'm all good with it.

[Roy_Stewart]

Thank you Roy.

A wolf!

Yeah, a white wolf. The animal appeared to me in a vision (not joking)

[Davros]

Sure you weren't doozing in front of Game of Thrones?

[Roy_Stewart]

I'm sure.