Can't find the right forum, then post your general surf-related remarks here!
Moderators: jimmy, collnarra, PeepeelaPew, Butts, beach_defender, Shari, Forum Moderators
-
Trev
- Huey's Right Hand
- Posts: 31070
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2004 3:11 pm
- Location: Any Point Break
Post
by Trev » Mon Feb 13, 2017 7:54 pm
Beanpole wrote:Okay......just a coincidence when it looks as big as they say it does.....rightio. A bit like economic predictions.
Mate, you and I are old enough to remember when wave heights were measured in real life, not some airy fairy fcuken formula based on trying to make the modern day surfer look tough.
6' is 6'.
But just remember, based on Iggy's scale, he's got a 2" dick.
Having said all that, Iggy did make the point once that maybe we should assess the wave height on what it is after the first 20 metres or so, after it's settled down a bit. I sort of get that.
However, if you get hit just after take off, you're still being hit by 6' of water, even if it does settle down to 3 or 4 ft a bit down the line.
That's all I have to say.
Carry on.
Beanpole
You aren’t the room Yuke You are just a wonky cafe table with a missing rubber pad on the end of one leg.
Skipper
I still don't buy the "official" narrative about 9/11. Oh sure, it happened, fcuk yeah. But who and why and how I'm, not convinced it was what we've been told.
-
Hatchnam
- Duke Status
- Posts: 18882
- Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 12:44 pm
Post
by Hatchnam » Mon Feb 13, 2017 8:17 pm
BA wrote:Beanpole wrote:Wouldn't call it overhead myself....unless the Bra picks up more southerly swell than Bronte and Bondi. As I said 4-5.
Courtesy of Coastalwatch. Bondi. That wave out the back looks well overhead to me.
Hate to say it BA, but you're not dealing with a regular normal human being here. He's almost 60, has been surfing for decades, and
still doesn't know how to read waves. You may as well be talking to the fkn wall mate
Sniff wrote: ↑Fri Feb 16, 2024 11:39 am
Not enough for a full handbeak
steve shearer wrote:full dionysian hand jive body torque
-
foamy
- Snowy McAllister
- Posts: 7980
- Joined: Thu May 08, 2014 6:46 pm
Post
by foamy » Mon Feb 13, 2017 8:30 pm
BA wrote:Beanpole wrote:Wouldn't call it overhead myself....unless the Bra picks up more southerly swell than Bronte and Bondi. As I said 4-5.
Courtesy of Coastalwatch. Bondi. That wave out the back looks well overhead to me.
I don't know. Though I am of the Beanie wave measuring school, you judge height on the main breaking section of a standard set, not on any unbroken peak.
And overhead is based on the surfer being erect, if you'll be excuse the very titillating ambiguity of that phrase.
-
Beanpole
- That's Not Believable
- Posts: 68782
- Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2005 8:21 am
- Location: Button Factory
Post
by Beanpole » Mon Feb 13, 2017 8:31 pm
Funny I still snare quite a few on the average day....without seeing the outside one hit the bank I suppose I could accept 6'...face.....just. As in just head high to slightly overhead. The one with the guy actually riding it.....5?
Probably more like 4-5 all up.
Back to the flowchart for you Hatchie.
Put your big boy pants on
I mean, tastebuds? WGAF?
-
The Mighty Sunbird
- Huey's Right Hand
- Posts: 22949
- Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 12:43 pm
- Location: Pogo's
Post
by The Mighty Sunbird » Mon Feb 13, 2017 8:46 pm
BA wrote:Beanpole wrote:Wouldn't call it overhead myself....unless the Bra picks up more southerly swell than Bronte and Bondi. As I said 4-5.
Courtesy of Coastalwatch. Bondi. That wave out the back looks well overhead to me.
Hey you FCUCKERS stop posting webcam picks of our break!
Erase.
-
Beanpole
- That's Not Believable
- Posts: 68782
- Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2005 8:21 am
- Location: Button Factory
Post
by Beanpole » Mon Feb 13, 2017 8:50 pm
That's right.......Bondi never has any waves. The photo is a hoax.
Put your big boy pants on
I mean, tastebuds? WGAF?
-
Hatchnam
- Duke Status
- Posts: 18882
- Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 12:44 pm
Post
by Hatchnam » Mon Feb 13, 2017 8:53 pm
"Funny I still snare quite a few on the average day....without seeing the outside one hit the bank"
Translation
You only catch the reforms.
It's astonishing. The two major Aussie surf forecasting websites both use the same scale, because it's the same scale that practically every surfer uses and understands. Hundreds of thousands of people "get it". Anyone (still!!) unable to understand it should call it quits, sell their quiver and take up golf instead.
Sniff wrote: ↑Fri Feb 16, 2024 11:39 am
Not enough for a full handbeak
steve shearer wrote:full dionysian hand jive body torque
-
Beanpole
- That's Not Believable
- Posts: 68782
- Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2005 8:21 am
- Location: Button Factory
Post
by Beanpole » Mon Feb 13, 2017 9:13 pm
Of course as you well know Hatchnam....the act of surfing goes on without spurious and unnecessary wave measurement methods.
Put your big boy pants on
I mean, tastebuds? WGAF?
-
Beanpole
- That's Not Believable
- Posts: 68782
- Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2005 8:21 am
- Location: Button Factory
Post
by Beanpole » Mon Feb 13, 2017 9:16 pm
The Mighty Sunbird wrote:So that's why it's always smaller than the report?
Well it said 4-5 today on Coastalwatch for the eastern suburbs and that's what Id call it. However I assume if I called it 4-5 Hatchie should call it 1-2. That isn't allowing for over calling of course. Mysterious.
Put your big boy pants on
I mean, tastebuds? WGAF?
-
The Mighty Sunbird
- Huey's Right Hand
- Posts: 22949
- Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 12:43 pm
- Location: Pogo's
Post
by The Mighty Sunbird » Mon Feb 13, 2017 9:38 pm
The Sunbird Wave Scale:
Flat
Tiny
Small
Ok
A few good ones coming through
Solid
Fcucking massive
Brown pants day out there
Erase.
-
Beanpole
- That's Not Believable
- Posts: 68782
- Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2005 8:21 am
- Location: Button Factory
Post
by Beanpole » Mon Feb 13, 2017 9:44 pm
One thing that seems rather unfortunate about the Iggy Scale is that since the surf doesn't get overhead that often on the East Coast...80% of the time it has to be pretty meaningless. Basically 1-2, 1-2, 1-2,2-3, 1-2, 1, -1, -1, 1-2, 1-2, 1-2,1-2,2-3, 1-2, 1, 1, etc.
Put your big boy pants on
I mean, tastebuds? WGAF?
-
Hatchnam
- Duke Status
- Posts: 18882
- Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 12:44 pm
Post
by Hatchnam » Mon Feb 13, 2017 10:06 pm
"Iggy Scale" .. You're a fkn dunderhead beanpole. It's not my scale. It never was, nor will be. Just the same way I speak English, doesn't make it the "Iggy language". I've learnt the scale just the same way 95%+ of the Australian surfing fraternity has. Sell your boards, tomorrow. It's all too much for you. Take up making beeswax candles and get yourself a stall at the Bondi markets.
Sniff wrote: ↑Fri Feb 16, 2024 11:39 am
Not enough for a full handbeak
steve shearer wrote:full dionysian hand jive body torque
-
Beanpole
- That's Not Believable
- Posts: 68782
- Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2005 8:21 am
- Location: Button Factory
Post
by Beanpole » Mon Feb 13, 2017 10:16 pm
You know it's been referred to on here as that for years....since you took it upon yourself to articulate the size table in great detail. I rarely call it that myself.
Just looking at comments on here I think 95% is pushing it.
Put your big boy pants on
I mean, tastebuds? WGAF?
-
Slobadan Madicubich
- Harry the Hat
- Posts: 2977
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2014 1:04 pm
Post
by Slobadan Madicubich » Tue Feb 14, 2017 5:47 am
inside wave about chest high+
ridden wave head high
unbroken wave head high + about nearly half again
-
BA
- Duke Status
- Posts: 13574
- Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2004 12:03 pm
- Location: Mexico
Post
by BA » Tue Feb 14, 2017 7:22 am
The Mighty Sunbird wrote:Hey you FCUCKERS stop posting webcam picks of our break!
I'm gonna post a picture of Manly next. I'm not afraid of local heavies.
-
Davros
- Snowy McAllister
- Posts: 8578
- Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 3:46 pm
Post
by Davros » Tue Feb 14, 2017 8:31 am
The Mighty Sunbird wrote:BA wrote:Beanpole wrote:Wouldn't call it overhead myself....unless the Bra picks up more southerly swell than Bronte and Bondi. As I said 4-5.
Courtesy of Coastalwatch. Bondi. That wave out the back looks well overhead to me.
Hey you FCUCKERS stop posting webcam picks of our break!
That's a good 3ft
-
Nick Carroll
- Huey's Right Hand
- Posts: 26515
- Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2005 9:29 am
- Location: Newport Beach
Post
by Nick Carroll » Tue Feb 14, 2017 8:56 am
christ what is wrong with you guys, arguing over wave height, it sounds like an article on the Inertia
in other news, surfed all the left side runs on Hirafu/Niseko yesterday except the top bits. Today is gonna be about Niseko/Annapurni(?). I'm such a ski kook! But I love being shit at things and learning how to be better. I think it is gonna snow like hell in a couple of days so I'd better get better in a hurry.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 257 guests