congratulations realsurfers
Moderators: jimmy, collnarra, PeepeelaPew, Butts, beach_defender, Shari, Forum Moderators
[quote=It is a fundamentalist position, by definition. It is a statement that is often made by people who see the world in black and white, and who struggle with the concept of 'grey'. It is a statement made by the sort of people who say "either you're with us or you're agin us"!.[/quote]
Now here's a statement which is open to various interpretations.
I think you are using it to justify the use of recreational drugs, conditionally. However I agree with the statement because the majority of people in this world are shades of grey and IMHO they are the ones who lack the balanced judgement to allow them to take drugs safely.
They are part of the grey majority because they are unable to see things clearly enough to have a clear stance on something. And I think without that clear judgement they cannot assess when things are doing them damage.
Now here's a statement which is open to various interpretations.
I think you are using it to justify the use of recreational drugs, conditionally. However I agree with the statement because the majority of people in this world are shades of grey and IMHO they are the ones who lack the balanced judgement to allow them to take drugs safely.
They are part of the grey majority because they are unable to see things clearly enough to have a clear stance on something. And I think without that clear judgement they cannot assess when things are doing them damage.
- oldman
- Snowy McAllister
- Posts: 6886
- Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2004 1:11 pm
- Location: Probably Maroubra, goddammit!
Drugs are a personal choice. Make your choice and work out what works for you. I neither condone nor condemn drug taking, as drugs have no intrinsic value, either good or bad.TrevG wrote: I think you are using it to justify the use of recreational drugs, conditionally. However I agree with the statement because the majority of people in this world are shades of grey and IMHO they are the ones who lack the balanced judgement to allow them to take drugs safely.
If you can only see issues in terms of black and white, wrong and right, then you probably have very little ability to make a balanced judgement on anything, let alone the very tricky game of drug use. In that respect, my view is much opposed to yours.
- oldman
- Snowy McAllister
- Posts: 6886
- Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2004 1:11 pm
- Location: Probably Maroubra, goddammit!
No name calling beanpole. I welcome your point of view. I also have two children.Beanpole wrote: At least you haven't called me any names yet or questioned my ability as a parent
Hero worship is a natural phase in a child, it just needs to modified and tempered to make any use of it. A cynic is usually someone who has been let down by their heroes and decided that nothing is worth believing in any more.
BTW, I let my wife get upset about whether the kids eat enough vegies, but I'll be directing their emotional growth.
I think I see where you are coming from. My concern is that The "greys" are often easily led and as such can find themselves in situations beyond their capabilities.oldman wrote:Drugs are a personal choice. Make your choice and work out what works for you. I neither condone nor condemn drug taking, as drugs have no intrinsic value, either good or bad.TrevG wrote: I think you are using it to justify the use of recreational drugs, conditionally. However I agree with the statement because the majority of people in this world are shades of grey and IMHO they are the ones who lack the balanced judgement to allow them to take drugs safely.
If you can only see issues in terms of black and white, wrong and right, then you probably have very little ability to make a balanced judgement on anything, let alone the very tricky game of drug use. In that respect, my view is much opposed to yours.
However, I guess the "B & W" people are very focussed (like - leaders eg Captain of the kangaroos), so the very thing that sets them apart can work against them in that they'' do whatever it takes" to keep them at the pinnacle of their succes.
- oldman
- Snowy McAllister
- Posts: 6886
- Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2004 1:11 pm
- Location: Probably Maroubra, goddammit!
We're talking about similar things but not quite the same thing here TrevG. B & W's often have the courage to make decisions, principally because they are ignorant of subtlety and can stride in where angels fear to tread.TrevG wrote:I think I see where you are coming from. My concern is that The "greys" are often easily led and as such can find themselves in situations beyond their capabilities.
And they often become leaders because they will make decisions and will have great self belief. So they can often be great successes.
But invariably a lot of people get hurt by these leaders, as they don't have real leadership qualities, they just believe they do, and they always over-estimate their own abilities. I would suggest it is the B & W's of the world make up the majority of the deluded.
But we are talking about different things when we refer to seeing the grey, as what I am talking about has nothing to do with being led, nor does it relate to self awareness of your capabilities.
-
- That's Not Believable
- Posts: 68730
- Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2005 8:21 am
- Location: Button Factory
Too true. I work with a fine collection of B&Ws. A couple have an answer for everything even when they know nothing about the subject. The modern workplace promotes pseudo knowledge and pseudo experience. Rumsfeld is the extreme example.
Smnmntl no way with an avatar like youve got.
Cynic= Someone who doubts or denies the goodness of human motives, and who often displays this attitude by sneers, sarcasm,etc.
Smnmntl no way with an avatar like youve got.
Cynic= Someone who doubts or denies the goodness of human motives, and who often displays this attitude by sneers, sarcasm,etc.
- Revolution
- Snowy McAllister
- Posts: 5063
- Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 11:34 pm
- Location: DY.CURL
No, it had already been decided when it was originally posted.Revolution wrote:You had to wait till the end of the round to answer that one..Boozer wrote:It'd be mildly amusing if I supported penriff.Coops@DY wrote:Ouch!JuBu wrote:Good one, Shakespeare. Why don't you threaten me with your wooden spoon?
I wasn't going to bother until the sycophant chipped in.
Let's see. 20 points versus 18.Boozer wrote:No, it had already been decided when it was originally posted.Revolution wrote:You had to wait till the end of the round to answer that one..Boozer wrote:It'd be mildly amusing if I supported penriff.Coops@DY wrote:Ouch!JuBu wrote:Good one, Shakespeare. Why don't you threaten me with your wooden spoon?
I wasn't going to bother until the sycophant chipped in.
But a massive -290 points in the For & Against (pretty well double the next worst. I guess when you're bad, you're bad
No worries, but I think he may be a bit preoccupied at the moment.TrevG wrote:....Until the new coach arrived. He's not your best asset.
"JOEY FOR COACH!!!"
Here's a conspiracy theory for you; do you reckon that the purge that Smith has put through the Knights could have anything to do with recent revelations?
Couldn't care less personally. I still don't like him.
Joey is already doing great work with the younger guys. (Mullen & Co)
I hope none of the innuendo rubs off on them.
[quote="Boozer
Joey is already doing great work with the younger guys. (Mullen & Co)
I hope none of the innuendo rubs off on them.[/quote]
I think Joey will come through this OK. If he is sensible from here on in, he'll regain most of his lost ground. I must say I've often wondered about his occasional "out of character" actions. Maybe now explained.
And on Smith's purge, surely each player would have a drugs clause in his contract so there would be no need to go through this action of getting all the fans offside.
Joey is already doing great work with the younger guys. (Mullen & Co)
I hope none of the innuendo rubs off on them.[/quote]
I think Joey will come through this OK. If he is sensible from here on in, he'll regain most of his lost ground. I must say I've often wondered about his occasional "out of character" actions. Maybe now explained.
And on Smith's purge, surely each player would have a drugs clause in his contract so there would be no need to go through this action of getting all the fans offside.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 172 guests