yeah you know a bit about that dont youNick Carroll wrote:no doubt there will be No Comment from anyone, but then again there never is.
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
Moderators: jimmy, collnarra, PeepeelaPew, Butts, beach_defender, Shari, Forum Moderators
yeah you know a bit about that dont youNick Carroll wrote:no doubt there will be No Comment from anyone, but then again there never is.
andy2476 wrote:If I ever renovate our bathroom. I'm gonna put in a little step thing for shaving my legs
beerfan wrote:like today tonight, same episode over and over and no one watching. *turns up volume*
Hi Mr Mik! No I haven't.MrMik wrote:Hi Nick,![]()
have you ever surfed a modern Geoff McCoy board, shaped in say the last ten years or so?
If so, how did you like it?
andy2476 wrote:If I ever renovate our bathroom. I'm gonna put in a little step thing for shaving my legs
beerfan wrote:like today tonight, same episode over and over and no one watching. *turns up volume*
what's the point, Wingnut?wingnut2443 wrote:Hey Nick,
On a tangent from the q's from ctd, and your response ... and, well to help you fill in your recovery time![]()
What about a 'blind board' test ... and, no I don't mean getting totally pissed first![]()
Say, all boards supplied with no logo's, labels, marks, etc. ... just a number to identify the board and to cross reference comments from the test riders?
Why? Well, I guess I am wondering if there is potential for bias due the name, brand, shaper, etc ... as in, test riders could perceive shaper x makes great boards, so 'feels' his or her boards go better? A blind test would remove the potential for that bias?
Wow, the unreleased part 2 of his power ranking must have been explosive. Maybe he put Slater in 10th position and called him a has-been?Nick Carroll wrote:by the way, Lewis says he can't comment, adding "I wish I could"
and no reply as yet from the ASP.
Nick Carroll wrote:
Look at our most recent SL Test for example. I know shearer thinks it's just advertorial but let's put that aside for the moment.
just so you know, the SL Board Guide is the most popular single feature of the year with readers and (generally) with the board makers too - even the ones who don't get involved see a benefit.loofy wrote:As if Carroll is going to shit in his own nest and ruin the chances of a paid trip to the telos to do an infomercial by saying "yeah, me reviewing boards is a phucken waste of time, dont know why I bother"
the man is paid to write about surfing.
No, and I'd knock it back if they did.Battery wrote: Wow, the unreleased part 2 of his power ranking must have been explosive. Maybe he put Slater in 10th position and called him a has-been?
He should just start up a blog again... tag it on to MarineLayer and between Dane and him they could take over the world.
Do you think the ASP may offer you Lewis's position Nick?
Well this doesn't bode well for generating income from content built around the surfers.Nick Carroll wrote:No, and I'd knock it back if they did.Battery wrote: Wow, the unreleased part 2 of his power ranking must have been explosive. Maybe he put Slater in 10th position and called him a has-been?
He should just start up a blog again... tag it on to MarineLayer and between Dane and him they could take over the world.
Do you think the ASP may offer you Lewis's position Nick?
There was plenty in that first lot of Lewis's to piss off several WCT seeds. And the one thing the ZoSea crew don't want right now is to spook the horses. I mean they are about to commence running a tour which is currently about $22 million in the hole in its first year. This leaves the dot com bubble in the shade in its sheer chutzpah. They can't afford for the surfers to begin asking serious questions about the finances. I've just begun attempting to do just that of Speaker and co, can't wait to see the replies, if I ever get one.
marcus wrote:and that vicco dude, whatsisname?
Well, kind of…...until they're in their mid twenties, they get the cash from grumpy old know-it-alls and pass it on.swvic wrote: We're not the source of the cash. It's the kids -
Do you have any good links to that sort of thing?spork wrote: acid Mexican jazz soundtrack.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 119 guests